State v. L.W.J.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s order granting respondent’s petition to expunge her criminal records, arguing that the district court lacked both statutory authority to expunge court records and inherent authority to expunge executive-branch records. Because we conclude that the district court lacked statutory authority under Minn.Stat. § 609A.03 to expunge respondent’s court records and lacked inherent authority to expunge executive-branch records, we reverse.
FACTS
In April 2002, appellant State of Minnesota charged respondent L.W.J. with gross-misdemeanor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. AmbayeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. StevensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. T.M.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. C.P.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. DavissonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. K.M.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. V.A.J.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State of Minnesota v. S. A. M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. A.S.E.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- In re H.A.L.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.