Legal Opinion

State v. Ambaye

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 29, 2000No. C9-98-2221PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLATZ, Chief Justice.

This case began with respondent’s petition for the expungement of his criminal record. The district court concluded that respondent was not entitled to expungement under either the expungement statute or the court’s inherent power to expunge. The Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for the entry of an expungement order under the expungement statute. We hold that a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity does not satisfy the legal threshold that would entitle a petitioner to a presumption of ex-pungement under the statute. Accordingly, we reverse…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. BouwmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. State v. C. A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Nadeau v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. State v. RawlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Lickiss v. Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Bolander v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Wiegel v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. State v. M.D.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. Jag Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API