Legal Opinion
State v. C.P.H.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 3, 2006No. A05-636PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s decision granting respondent expungement under Minn.Stat. § 609A.02, subd. 3 (2004), and ordering appellant to seal its records. Respondent moves to seal the appellate file to give effect to the district court’s expungement order. We affirm and grant the motion.
FACTS
On December 18, 2002, respondent C.P.H. was arrested and subsequently charged with gross misdemeanor and misdemeanor offenses. The case was continued for dismissal after six months on the conditions that C.P.H. pay court costs and commit no same or similar offenses.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. C. A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. AmbayeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- City of St. Paul v. FroyslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. L.W.J.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. SwannCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. K.M.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. J.Y.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. A.C.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.