State v. J.Y.M.

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

The state challenges an order sealing non-court records related to respondent’s criminal prosecution for felony theft, arguing that because respondent entered a plea of guilty to the charge as a condition of the state’s agreement to his participation in a diversion program, respondent cannot meet the statutory prerequisite to ex-pungement that “all pending actions or proceedings were resolved in favor” of the respondent under Minn.Stat. § 609A.02, subd. 3 (2004).

FACTS

Respondent J.Y.M. was charged with aiding and abetting theft in connection with an attempt to use…