Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 11, 2000No. 1 CA-CR 99-0136PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

¶ 1 Arthur Leon Thompson (“Appellant”) was sentenced on a theft conviction at the same time he was sentenced on two other felony convictions for offenses that were not committed on the same occasion as the theft offense. The State alleged that the other convictions were “historical prior felony convictions” to the theft conviction within the meaning of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 13-604(V) (Supp. 1999), 1 which provides enhanced sentences for repetitive offenders. Appellant argued that the applicable sentence-enhancement schedule was the less…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. HannahArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. SteelmanArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. MurrayArizona Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. SiddleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. State v. DavissonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API