Legal Opinion

Gantt v. Sentry Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1992No. S014212PublishedCited by 264 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

We granted review in this case to consider whether an employee who was terminated in retaliation for supporting a coworker’s claim of sexual harassment may state a cause of action for tortious discharge against public policy and, if so, whether the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers’ Compensation Act bar the action. We hold that the claim is actionable under Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (1980) 27 Cal.3d 167 [164 Cal.Rptr. 839, 610 P.2d 1330, 9 A.L.R.4th 314] (Tameny), and is not preempted by the workers’ compensation law.

*1086I. Procedural Background

Defendants, Sentry…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by264 opinions

  1. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

259 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API