Legal Opinion

People v. Olguin

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2008No. S149303PublishedCited by 169 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*378Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

At issue in this case is a condition of probation requiring defendant to notify his probation officer of the presence of any pets at defendant’s place of residence. Defendant contends the challenged condition is not reasonably related to future criminality, limits his fundamental rights, and is unconstitutionally overbroad. We disagree. Probation officers are charged with supervising probationers’ compliance with the specific terms of their probation to ensure the safety of the public and the rehabilitation of probationers. Pets residing with probationers have the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. James F. Robinson v. Solano County Brian Cauwells, Solano County Sheriff's Deputy Officer Gary Faulkner, Solano County Sheriff's Deputy OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by169 opinions

  1. People v. Ricardo P. (In Re Ricardo P.)California Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Lozano v. City of HazletonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. People v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. People v. FeyrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API