Legal Opinion
Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLC
California Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 2012No. S186149PublishedCited by 345 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
An owners association filed the instant construction defect action against a condominium developer, seeking recovery for damage to its property and damage to the separate interests of the condominium owners who compose its membership. In response, the developer filed a motion to compel arbitration, based on a clause in the recorded declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions providing that the association and the individual owners agree to resolve any construction dispute with the developer through binding arbitration in accordance with the Federal Arbitration Act…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by345 opinions
- Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
- Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Lorrie Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
340 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.