Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. City of San Carlos
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1981No. Civ. 46817PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARRY-DEAL, J.
Kent D. Reynolds appeals from the judgment of the superior court denying his petition for a writ of mandate pursuant. to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5. In his petition appellant sought to compel the Civil Service Commission of the City of San Carlos (Commission) to grant his application for service connected disabili ty retirement under the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS), which by contract with the city pursuant to Government Code section 20450 provides retirement benefits to the city’s employees.
Appellant, a 32-year-old firefighter, injured his knee…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Borror v. Department of InvestmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Dickey v. Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Boyd v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Mansperger v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Heaton v. Marin County Employees Retirement BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Haywood v. American River Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Watkins v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Barberic v. City of HawthorneDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
- Garner v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Ragan v. City of HawthorneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.