Legal Opinion

Garner v. City of Riverside

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1985No. E000748PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

David C. Garner (petitioner) appeals from an order dismissing his petition for writ of administrative mandate on the ground it was not timely filed. We affirm.

Facts

Petitioner was employed as a police officer by respondent City of Riverside from approximately April 13, 1972, through December 25, 1978. The city had elected to have certain of its employees, including petitioner, become members of the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) and entered into a contract for that purpose pursuant to Government Code sections 20450 1 and 20493. 2 (All statutory references will be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen v. Humboldt County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Reynolds v. City of San CarlosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Usher v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Watkins v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Barberic v. City of HawthorneDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
  4. Ragan v. City of HawthorneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Aspire Power Ventures, LP v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Thomas Gleeson, Lori Cobos, Jimmy Glotfelty, Kathleen Jackson, and Courtney Hjaltman, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API