Legal Opinion
Dickey v. Retirement Board
California Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 1976No. Docket Nos. S.F. 23357, 23358PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J
In these two cases, consolidated on appeal, involving the separate applications of members of the San Francisco Police Department for full salary benefits, we must decide whether the decisions of defendant Retirement Board of the City and County of San Francisco (Board) denying the applications substantially affect a fundamental vested right so as to require the trial court on review to exercise its independent judgment on the evidence under the rules announced by this court in Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 28 [112 Cal.Rptr. 805,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Frink v. ProdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Hernandez v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Wences v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.