Legal Opinion
Mansperger v. Public Employees' Retirement System
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 23, 1970No. Civ. 34589PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.
Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandate to set aside a decision of respondent Public Employees’ Retirement System.
Petitioner sought to have the superior court reverse respondent’s decisions that petitioner was not physically incapacitated - from performing his duties as a fish and game warden within the meaning of Government Code section 21022, and thus was not eligible for disability retirement. An alternative writ of mandate was issued, trial was had, the administrative record was received in evidence, the petition for the writ of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dillard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hurley v. SykesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Quincy Retirement Board v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- New England Mutual Life Insurance v. HuckinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
3Cited by25 opinions
- Nolan v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Craver v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Harmon v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Cansdale v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Thelander v. City of El MonteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.