Legal Opinion
Barberic v. City of Hawthorne
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 10, 1987No. CV 85-1183 SVW(Kx)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
WILSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Shari Barberic brought this action pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Hawthorne (the City) and its Chief of Police, Kenneth Stonebraker, claiming that her involuntary psychological disability retirement as a police woman with the City’s police department violated her due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution and her right of free expression under the First Amendment.
Specifically, Barberic claims, first, that she was deprived of a protected property interest without due process because she was…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bostean v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Derstein v. BensonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Ameritech Michigan v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Oyarzo v. Tuolumne Fire DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Bostean v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1998