Legal Opinion
Robert S. KRAVIG and Arnold E. Johnson, Appellants, v. David J. HENDERSON, Appellee
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided August 6, 1966No. 1015PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority as to all of the four counts remaining in interference No. 92,874 to David J. Henderson, the junior party.
The invention in issue relates to a machine for making decorative bows from a continuous length of ribbon. The machine includes a rotatable loop retaining means capable of retaining in fixed position relative thereto ribbon which is applied to it by a ribbon feed means which operates successively to apply spaced portions of the ribbon against the retaining means. The retaining means is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Globe-Union, Inc. v. Chicago Telephone Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Joshua C. Conner v. George G. JorisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- James A. Patterson and Glenn K. Lissner v. Karl-Heinz HauckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Torsten Hasselstrom and Malcolm C. Henry v. Blaine C. McKusickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- James L. Gianladis v. Gus S. KassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Berwick Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Hedgewick v. AkersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- John F. Cody v. Aktiebolaget FlymoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Robert S. Kravig and Arnold E. Johnson v. David J. HendersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Gilbert R. Wolter, Alfred F. Ernstberger and Frederick J. Ritter v. Michael E. Belicka, Robert J. Kenny and Rodney LonginCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.