Legal Opinion

Robert S. Kravig and Arnold E. Johnson v. David J. Henderson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 3, 1968No. Patent Appeal 7862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This case is here on Kravig’s petition for further review, having been previously before us as reported at 362 F.2d 1015, 53 CCPA 1534, to which reference is made for background. The parties re-briefed the case in March 1968 and re-argued it on April 3, 1968.

In the opinion by the late Judge Martin, July 14, 1966, we reported our unanimous decision to reverse the award of priority by the Board of Patent Interferences to Henderson on counts 3 and 6 and to remand to the board on those counts. On remand, the board awarded priority to Kravig. As to counts 1 and 2, however, we affirmed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robert S. KRAVIG and Arnold E. Johnson, Appellants, v. David J. HENDERSON, AppelleeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Berwick Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Berwick Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Krenzer v. StoffelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  4. Krenzer v. StoffelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API