Legal Opinion
Joshua C. Conner v. George G. Joris
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 21, 1957No. 6225PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention, as claimed in the single count hereinafter set forth, to the senior party, George C. Joris (hereinafter referred to as Joris). The single count in issue reads as follows:
“In a process for oxidizing cu-mene to cumene hydroperoxide in liquid phase with elemental oxygen as oxidizing agent, the improvement which comprises maintaining solid sodium bicarbonate in contact with said cumene, at reaction temperature in the range between about…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Robert A. Reiners v. Charles L. MehltretterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Burns v. CurtisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Chittick v. LyonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Landon v. GinztonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Bowers v. ValleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc., E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. Berkley and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- In Re Natta, Movant in the United States Patent Office Before the Examiner of Interferences, Interference No. 89634. Hogan v. Zletz v. Baxter v. Natta E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Barry v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.