Legal Opinion
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Berwick Industries, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 1, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-120PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
This is an action for infringement of United States Patents No. 3,112,240 and No. 2,933,223, relating to decorative ribbon bows and the apparatus and methods for making such bows. The Plaintiff Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M) seeks damages and a permanent injunction against further infringement of said patents by Berwick Industries, Inc. (Berwick). The jurisdiction of this Court is predicated upon the fact that this is an action arising under the patent laws of the United States. Defenses denying infringement and challenging the validity and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- De Forest Radio Telephone Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Continental Coatings Corporation v. Metco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Allen-Myland, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Johnson & Johnson v. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. Dart Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
- Grefco, Inc. v. Kewanee Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.