Legal Opinion

Charlotte Consolidated Construction Co. v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNou, J.

At the close of all the evidence at the trial of this action, the defendant moved for judgment as of nonsuit, and excepted to the refusal of the court to allow its motion. On its appeal to this Court, in support of its assignment of error based on this exception, the defendant contends:

1. That there was no evidence from which the court could find that the defendant had taken from the plaintiff and appropriated to its own use the water mains owned by the plaintiff, as alleged in the complaint;

2. That all the evidence showed that plaintiff’s right of action, if any, to recover for the water…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stephens Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Farr v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yates v. JamisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  2. Spaugh v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Styers v. City of GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Central Carolina Developers, Inc. v. Moore Water & Sewer AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Spaugh v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API