Legal Opinion

Styers v. City of Gastonia

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1960No. 170PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Plaintiffs’ evidence is sufficient for a jury to find: Plaintiffs caused to be constructed between 1948 and 1955 the water lines for which they now seek compensation. When constructed, the lines were beyond the corporate limits of Gastonia. The lines were built at the suggestion of Mr. Abernathy, director of utilities of Gas-tonia, as an investment by which plaintiffs would profit by selling to adjacent property owners the right to tap the lines and thereby receive water from defendant. Construction of the lines benefited defendant by enabling it to sell water to those whom plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Abbott Realty Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Hawkins v. Town of DallasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Spaugh v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Jackson v. City of GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Charlotte Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. In Re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Derby Heights, Inc. v. Gantt Water & Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Crownhill Homes, Inc. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Crownhill Homes, Inc. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API