Legal Opinion

Spaugh v. City of Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1952No. 746PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, C. J.

The plaintiffs claim compensation for the appropriation by the city of Winston-Salem of the water and sewer lines installed by them in the real estate development known as Konnoak Hills, consequent upon the extension of the corporate limits of the city to include the territory in which this development is situated. They base their claim upon the broad principle that the city having taken exclusive control of their property and denied compensation therefor, they have thus been deprived of property without due process of law in violation of rights assured them by the Constitution of the United…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Abbott Realty Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. McKinney v. DeneenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. City of Danville v. Forest Hills Development Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  4. Ford Realty & Construction Co. v. Cleveland (City)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Stephens Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Crownhill Homes, Inc. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Derby Heights, Inc. v. Gantt Water & Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Selected Investments Corp. v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Jackson v. City of GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API