Yates v. Jamison
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Wilbert and Eleanor Yates brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Charlotte and its agents alleging that defendants had destroyed a house they owned without notice in violation of the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment. We granted defendants permission to file this interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) after the district court denied their motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for a failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We hold that the Supreme Court’s decision in Parratt v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gallimore v. SinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Horace Wilkins v. Gordon Lee Whitaker, Detective, H.P.P.D. John Faircloth, Chief of Police, H.P.P.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sheila Vinson v. Campbell County Fiscal Court Nickie Hornsby and William StollCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Plumer v. MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Fields v. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Plumer v. MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.