Legal Opinion

Farr v. City of Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 12, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReogdeN, J.

Was there evidence that the defendant did “on and after 30 June, 1929, wrongfully take possession of said water main and appropriate the same to its own use?”

The facts relied upon by the plaintiff to show wrongful taking and appropriation are as follows:(a) The extension of the limits of the city of Asheville in June, 1929, thus incorporating the water system into the general system of the city.(b) The repairing of a leak on Farrwood Avenue near Vineyard Street.(c) The flushing of a hydrant at a dead-end on Vineyard Street by the city plumber.(d) The extension of the Virginia Avenue water…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Powell v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Caveness v. Charlotte, Raleigh & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Huntley v. PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Jackson v. City of GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Covington v. City of RockinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Styers v. City of GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Charlotte Consolidated Construction Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API