Legal Opinion
Spaugh v. City of Winston-Salem
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 1, 1952No. 746Published
1Opinion of the Court
68 S.E.2d 838 (1952)
234 N.C. 708
SPAUGH et al.
v.
CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM.
No. 746.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
February 1, 1952.
Ralph M. Stockton, Jr., H. M. Ratcliff, John J. Ingle and Richmond Rucker, all of Winston-Salem, for plaintiffs, appellants.
Womble, Carlyle, Martin & Sandridge, Winston-Salem, for defendant, appellee.
DEVIN, Chief Justice.
The plaintiffs claim compensation for the appropriation by the city of Winston-Salem of the water and sewer lines installed by them in the real estate development known as Konnoak Hills, consequent upon the extension of the corporate limits of the city…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hildebrand v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Abbott Realty Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- McKinney v. DeneenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- City of Danville v. Forest Hills Development Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1935
- Spaugh v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.