National Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
On July 31, 1933, a statute known as the “Retail Sales Tax Act of 1933” (Stats. 1933, p. 2599) became effective. As far as here is important, the title of that statute is "An Act imposing a tax for the privilege of selling tangible personal property and for the privilege of furnishing, preparing or serving tangible personal property, providing for permits to retailers, (and) providing for the levying, assessing, collecting, paying and disposing of such tax, ...” In part, section 3 of the statute provides that, “For the privilege of selling tangible personal property at retail a tax is hereby…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coolidge v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Roth Drug, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. Herbert's of Los Angeles, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Rio Grande Oil Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Weatherford v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Ainsworth v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Tower Plaza Investments, Limited v. DeWittArizona Supreme Court · 1973
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.