Legal Opinion
Roth Drug, Inc. v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1936No. Civ. 5514PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment which was rendered against the plaintiffs for failure to amend their complaint after a demurrer thereto had been sustained on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
There are 550 plaintiffs who are parties to this action. They are retail merchants doing business in- California. The complaint alleges that they paid under protest sales taxes in the aggregate sum of $61,293.30 to the Treasurer of the State of California, within ninety days from the date of the adoption of the California Retail Sales Tax Act. (Stats.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- American Sugar Refining Co. v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Stockdale v. Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cook v. Marshall CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Geiger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Delaney v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Hunt v. Mayor & Council of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.