Legal Opinion

Coolidge v. Long

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1931No. 33 and 34PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butlek

Each of these appeals brings here for review a decree of the probate, court of Norfolk county, Massachusetts, entered in accordance with a rescript from the supreme judicial court of the Commonwealth. 268 Mass. 443; 167 N. E. 757. In each ^appellants presented to the probate court an application.:for the abatemeiit of an inheritance tax assessed under § í;:;c.. 65, General Laws. There was drawn in question the validity of the statute on the ground of its being repugnant to the contract clause of the Federal Constitution and the-due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Welch v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Milliken v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Helvering v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API