Legal Opinion

Ainsworth v. Bryant

California Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1949No. S. F. 17880PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff, a retail seller of intoxicating liquor, brought this action to enjoin defendants from enforcing against him the “Purchase and Use Tax Ordinance” of the city and county of San Francisco. Defendants’ demurrer to the complaint was sustained and an injunction was denied. From the judgment accordingly entered, plaintiff appeals.

Duly enacted by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and approved by the mayor in July, 1947, with the tax levy effective as of October 1, 1947, the ordinance—No. 4537—is one “imposing [an] excise tax on the retail purchase, use or other consumption of tangible…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. General Trading Co. v. State Tax Commission of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Monamotor Oil Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Rivera v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API