Legal Opinion

Weatherford v. City of San Rafael

California Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2017No. S219567PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cuéllar, J.

*1244 In California, concerns about improper government expenditures can give rise to more than just criticism in the public sphere or *1245 complaints to elected officials. Under Code of Civil Procedure section 526a, 1 certain individuals and corporations also have a right to pursue legal actions enjoining wasteful or illegal expenditures by government entities. Whether someone can use this provision to begin a lawsuit depends on whether the person has standing to do so. At issue in this case is whether an individual's standing to sue under section 526a requires the payment of a property…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Mission Beverage Co. v. Pabst Brewing Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Diaz v. Grill Concepts Servs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API