Legal Opinion

Rio Grande Oil Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1935No. Civ. No. 10143PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action to recover the purchase price of a quantity of gasoline, including the amount of the tax imposed by the Motor Vehicle Fuel License Tax Act (Stats. 1923, p. 571, and amendatory acts), which item was separately stated. It is conceded that the gasoline involved was “to be used in essential governmental functions”. The judgment was for the full amount of the claim including the tax. The sole question presented is this: Is a municipality entitled to purchase motor vehicle fuel from a distributor without payment either by the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. Ventura Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. Herbert's of Los Angeles, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. National Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Pacific Fruit Express Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Graham Bros., Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API