Legal Opinion

In Re Bittaker

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1997No. A076514PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STRANKMAN, P. J.

We hold that an inmate who has been declared a vexatious litigant retains the right to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus unencumbered by vexatious litigant procedures which apply to the filing of a civil action or proceeding.

Background

In 1979, Lawrence S. Bittaker (petitioner) kidnapped five teenage girls, raped four of them, tortured at least one, and murdered all five. A jury found him guilty of 26 felony counts and found 38 special circumstances. The trial court pronounced a judgment of death, and the California Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. DuvallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. McAllister v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Bravo v. IsmajCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Thompson v. IoaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. People v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API