Legal Opinion

In re Reno

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2012No. S124660PublishedCited by 192 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

We issued an order to show cause in this case to address a problem that, over time, has threatened to undermine the efficacy of the system for adjudicating petitions for collateral relief in cases involving the death penalty. The cases of those individuals sentenced to suffer the ultimate penalty in this state are automatically appealed directly to this court, bypassing the intermediate Court of Appeal. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 11, subd. (a); Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b).) Should this court affirm the judgment on direct appeal, such defendants are entitled to further…

2Cases cited140 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by192 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In re CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Robinson v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  5. In re Tyrone A. Miller On Habeas Corpus, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API