Legal Opinion

Stuers v. Clough

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1894No. 18311PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Merced County granting letters of administration to the public administrator and denying them to another appellant. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

H. W. Muersing died intestate in the county of Merced, leaving an estate therein, but no relative resident of the state, his next of kin being his father, a nonresident. Two applications were made for letters of administration upon the estate: one by A. G. Clough, as public administrator of the county, the other by one F. V. A. de Stuers, basing his right to administer upon the request and nomination of the father of deceased. The court appointed Clough, the public administrator, and denied the application of de Stuers, and the latter appeals from the order..The point relied upon by appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re BauquierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In re the Estate of BeechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Estate of MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Estate of KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brundage v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Abrahams v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Rice v. TiltonWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Boynton v. HearttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. In Re Estate of MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API