In Re Estate of Martin
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Napa County denying a petition for the revocation of letters of administration on the estate of a deceased person, and refusing to issue letters of administration to the petitioner. Henry C. Gesford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
The deceased died intestate, and Clarence Martin, a nephew and heir (being a son of a deceased brother of deceased), was appointed administrator of his estate on October 19, 1911. Letters of administration were issued to said Clarence Martin on October 24, 1911. On November 29, 1911, John Martin, a son of Andrew Martin, who is a brother of deceased and one of his heirs, at the written request of his father, filed his petition under section 1383 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the revocation of such letters of administration issued to Clarence Martin, and asking that he, John Martin, be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Estate of BeechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- In re Estate of CotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Estate of MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Stuers v. CloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Estate of WootenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Estate of WayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Estate of CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Estate of MintaberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Estate of DeBrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Estate of RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.