Legal Opinion

Brundage v. Union Trust Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1904No. S.F. No. 3580PublishedCited by 25 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco granting letters of administration with the will annexed. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting letters oí¿ administration with the will annexed upon the estate of Mary Ann Brundage, deceased, to the Union Trust Company of San Francisco, and refusing to grant such letters to Charles S. Brundage.

The deceased was a resident of New York, and left property, real and personal, in this state. By her will, which was duly admitted to probate in the state of New York, she appointed one Schafmeister, a resident of that state, executor. Six children survived her, each of whom was a devisee and legatee under the will. One of these children was her son,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re BauquierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In re Estate of BedellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. In re the Estate of BeechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Abrahams v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. McGilvary v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cameron v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Blackburn v. BlackburnMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Farnsworth v. HatchUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Randall v. PhilbrookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Rice v. TiltonWyoming Supreme Court · 1905

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API