Abrahams v. Hosselkus
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Lassen County, granting letters of administration to the pubHc administrator. E. A. Kelly, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is the appeal of L. Abrahams from the order denying his petition for letters of administration upon the estate of Matthew Healy, deceased, and granting letters to another petitioner, J. W. Hosselkus, public administrator.
*163The only relations of the deceased living in California are Ulty and James McCabe and their married sister, all children of a deceased sister of the intestate. Ulty and James, being of lawful age, and of the next of kin, were entitled to letters as belonging to the seventh class enumerated in section 1365 of the Code of Civil Procedure. They did not themselves apply for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Hyatt v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Bronner v. JahantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- In re Estate of BedellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- In re the Estate of DorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brundage v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- In re Estate of MurphyMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re the Estate of OlceseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Melzner v. TrucanoMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Estate of MyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.