In re Bauquier
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Sacramento County denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
Mary C. Rode was named in the will of Joseph Bauquier, deceased, as executrix without bonds, and filed in the superior court of Sacramento County her petition for the probate of said will, and for the issuance to her of letters testamentary. Objections to her appointment as executrix were filed by her brothers, who were also legatees named in the will, upon the alleged ground that she in the lifetime of said Joseph Bauquier, “for the purpose of pecuniary gain, and to obtain an unjust and larger portion of the estate of said Joseph Bauquier, deceased, than she was legally or morally entitled…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re the Estate of DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In re the Estate of WiardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Coope v. LowerreNew York Court of Chancery · 1845
- Estate of CalahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Lutz v. ChristyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Michigan Trust Co. v. BronsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Tuohy's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Clark v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.