People v. Gokcek
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WALSH, J.
Since 1872, California law has allowed the civil compromise of certain misdemeanor offenses if a criminal defendant adequately compensates the person injured for all costs incurred. (Pen. Code, §§ 1377-1379.) Upon proof of compensation and satisfaction of the injured person, the court can dismiss the criminal charges against the defendant.
In the instant case, the criminal defendant sought dismissal of his misdemeanor charge of false imprisonment for an act which occurred on January 3, 2003, against a minor who was 14 years old at the time. The trial court found that a civil…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. Dimacali, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. GOKCEKCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. GourleyAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2011
- People v. CluckSuperior Court of Guam · 2026