Legal Opinion
People v. GOKCEK
California Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 2006No. 1-05-AP-000244PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
42 Cal.Rptr.3d 405 (2006)
138 Cal.App.4th Supp. 8
The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
Ihsan GOKCEK, Defendant and Respondent.
No. 1-05-AP-000244.
Appellate Division, Superior Court, Santa Clara County.
January 31, 2006.
As Modified February 28, 2006.
George Kennedy, District Attorney, Cindy L. Cole, Deputy District Attorney, Denise J. Raabe, Deputy District Attorney, and Mary Shine, Deputy District Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Peter F. Goldscheider, Palo Alto, for Defendant and Respondent.
OPINION
BRIAN C. WALSH, Judge.
Since 1872, California law has allowed the civil compromise of certain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Dimacali, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. GourleyAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2011