People v. Dimacali
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtO'Rourke, J.
*270*826California law allows the civil compromise of certain offenses involving a person "injured by an act constituting a misdemeanor" who "has a remedy by a civil action" so long as the criminal defendant compensates the injured person and pays all costs incurred. ( Pen. Code,1 §§ 1377, 1378 ; see People v. Gokcek (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th Supp. 8, 11, 42 Cal.Rptr.3d 405.) This appeal presents the question of whether a misdemeanor charge of leaving the scene of an accident causing only property damage in violation of Vehicle Code section 20002, subdivision (a) (commonly referred to as…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- California v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. HomickCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Episcopal Church CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. JimenezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- People v. JimenezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024