Legal Opinion

People v. Dimacali

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 28, 2019No. D074680PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO'Rourke, J.

*270*826California law allows the civil compromise of certain offenses involving a person "injured by an act constituting a misdemeanor" who "has a remedy by a civil action" so long as the criminal defendant compensates the injured person and pays all costs incurred. ( Pen. Code,1 §§ 1377, 1378 ; see People v. Gokcek (2006) 138 Cal.App.4th Supp. 8, 11, 42 Cal.Rptr.3d 405.) This appeal presents the question of whether a misdemeanor charge of leaving the scene of an accident causing only property damage in violation of Vehicle Code section 20002, subdivision (a) (commonly referred to as…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. California v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. HomickCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Episcopal Church CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  2. Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. Bennett v. Rancho Cal. Water Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. People v. JimenezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. People v. JimenezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API