Legal Opinion

Collins v. O'Laverty

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1902No. L.A. No. 994PublishedCited by 26 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion. H. H. Appel, W. H. Morris, and Walter J. Horgan, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

This is a suit to set aside a deed of conveyance of land, made to the defendant Nora by the plaintiff’s intestate a few days before her death. The findings and judgment were for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for new trial.

The points urged on behalf of the appellants are: That the complaint was insufficient; that the findings are not supported by the evidence; and that the judgment against J. J. O’Laverty (the husband) for costs was erroneous.

The last two objections may be briefly disposed of. With regard to the findings,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Watson v. SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Janes v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Pennie v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Tuffree v. PolhemusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Snodgrass v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Chase v. LeiterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. County of Los Angeles v. WinansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API