Legal Opinion

Rose v. Melody Lane

California Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1952No. L. A. 21984PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

This action was brought to recover for personal injuries sustained in defendant’s cocktail lounge when the stool on which plaintiff was sitting collapsed. Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict was denied. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for $1.00 general damages and $250 special damages. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial on the single issue of damages was granted. Defendant has appealed from the judgment and from the order granting a limited new trial.

Sufficiency of the Evidence

At about 11 p. m., plaintiff and a friend entered defendant’s cocktail room for a drink on their way…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Gordon v. Aztec Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Leet v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Helfend v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Leonard v. Watsonville Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Di Mare v. CresciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API