Barboza v. Pacific Portland Cement Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County and from an order refusing a new trial. A. J. Buckles, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The plaintiff, suing as administrator of the estate of Caesar Augustus, brought this action to recover damages for the alleged negligent killing of his intestate. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for twenty-five hundred dollars. The defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The defendant corporation was engaged in the manufacture of cement. Its plant, which was located at a point called Cement, was connected by a spur line or track with the main railroad line of the Southern Pacific Company, the point of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Haynes v. MeeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- London & San Francisco Bank v. BandmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Jennings v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Redfield v. Oakland Consolidated Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Florez v. Groom Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Ostertag v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Jones v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
- Phoenix Assurance Co. v. Texas Holding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.