Fresno Estate Co. v. Fiske
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Fresno County refusing a new trial. S. E. Crow, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Gavin McNab, Everts & Ewing, E. P. Henshall, and Luther P. Elkins, for Appellant. N. C. Coldwell, F. H. Short, F. E. Cook, W. S. Goodfellow, and Goodfellow, Bells, Moore & Orrick, for Eespondents.
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] These two actions were consolidated and tried together. The appeals are from the orders denying the motion by Jay Allen Fiske in each case for a new trial.
The Fresno Estate Company sued to quiet title to certain real property in Fresno County. Jay Allen Fiske answered and filed a cross-complaint, which is substantially the same as the bill in equity, by the filing of which the second suit was commenced. The corporation answered both the cross-complaint and the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Consolidated Construction Co. v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Putnam v. Pickwick Stages, Northern Division, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Bryant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Lucci v. United Credit and Collection Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.