Giacomelli v. Scottsdale Insurance
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart
¶1 Plaintiffs Tim Giacomelli and Don Hamilton (collectively, “Jockeys”) appeal the order of the District Court for the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County, granting summary judgment in favor of Scottsdale Insurance Company (Scottsdale). We affirm.
¶2 We consider the following issues on appeal:
¶3 1. Whether the District Court erroneously interpreted the term “exhibitors” from § 23-4-205, MCA, to exclude jockeys;
¶4 2. Whether the District Court erred in holding that the Jockeys were not entitled to recovery from Scottsdale, but stated that the Jockeys had a claim against the Montana…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Sullins v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Transamerica Insurance v. RoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1983
- Lower Paxon Township v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Sports Shooting Ass'n v. State, Mt. Dept. of FwpMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Wellcome v. Home InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- Winter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Kilby Butte Colony, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
- Clark Fork Coalition v. Montana WelMontana Supreme Court · 2016
- Lenz v. FSC SecuritiesMontana Supreme Court · 2018
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.