Legal Opinion

Fisher v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2013No. DA 12-0346PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶ 1 Sharon McCartney (Sharon) and Leslie McCartney (Les), wife and husband, sought declaratory relief that Les’s umbrella policy with State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm) provided coverage for injuries sustained by Sharon as a result of Les’s negligent driving. State Farm answered that there was no coverage for Sharon’s claim due to a family member exclusion in the umbrella policy. The Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, concluded that the policy was not ambiguous, did not violate the McCartneys’ reasonable expectations, and did not violate Montana public policy,…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Transamerica Insurance v. RoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY v. Ribi Immunochem Research, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Stutzman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Montana Petroleum Tank Release Compensation Board v. Crumleys, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2008

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Pilgeram v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. FreyerMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Winter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Lenz v. FSC SecuritiesMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. American States Insurance v. Flathead Janitorial & Rug Services, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2015

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API