Legal Opinion
Lenz v. FSC Securities
Montana Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 2018No. DA 17-0124PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice Dirk Sandefur delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶1 Beverly Lenz, Darina Williams, Terrance Brady, Dean A. Hoistad, Larry Vervick, and Richard W. Horton (collectively Investors) appeal the order of the Montana Fourth Judicial District Court staying proceedings and compelling them to submit all asserted claims against FSC Securities Corporation (FSC) and Rocky Mountain Financial Advisors, L.L.C. (f/k/a/ Rocky Mountain Financial, L.L.C.), and Eric D. Rolshoven (collectively RMF) to arbitration. We affirm and restate the dispositive issues as:
1. Did the District Court erroneously…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Peeler v. Rocky Mountain Log Homes Can., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
- Kapor v. RJC Inv., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2019
- Sayler v. Yan SunMontana Supreme Court · 2023
- Bucy v. Edward Jones & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2019
- U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. Estate of WardMontana Supreme Court · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.