Legal Opinion

Clark Fork Coalition v. Montana Wel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 2016No. DA 14-0813PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKINNON

¶1 The Water Use Act provides a comprehensive permit based system for new appropriations of water in Montana. The Act permits certain groundwater appropriations to be exempt from the permitting process. Relevant here, § 85-2-306(3)(a)(iii), MCA, provides an exemption when a groundwater appropriation does not exceed 35 gallons per minute and 10 acre-feet per year. However, the subsection also provides an “exception]” to the exemption when a “combined appropriation” from the same source by two or more wells or developed springs exceeds 10 acre-feet per year, regardless of flow rate.

¶2 The term…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Shea v. North-Butte Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Paulsen v. DanielsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Trustees of Indiana University v. BuxbaumMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Giacomelli v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. Mont. Dep't of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Clark Fork Coalition v. TubbsMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Advocates v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Walden v. Yellowstone ElectricMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. M. HowardMontana Supreme Court · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API