Legal Opinion

Wellcome v. Home Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1993No. 92-387PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

This case is before us on certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concerning interpretation of insurance policy provisions.

A Montana trial court imposed sanctions against Page Wellcome (Wellcome), a Montana attorney, for disregarding its orders regarding voir dire, examination of witnesses and argument. The court ordered Wellcome and the insurer for his client to pay the sanctions. The sanctions, either as ordered or as compromised, ultimately were paid by Page Wellcome and Aetna Insurance Company.

Wellcome submitted a claim for the amount of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance v. RoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Farmers Union Mutual Insurance v. OaklandMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Passage v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Bauer Ranch, Inc. v. Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of BraunMontana Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Stutzman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Treichel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Giacomelli v. Scottsdale InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Newbury v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2008

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API