Transamerica Insurance v. Royle
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison
This case comes from the Federal District Court by way of certification pursuant to Rule 1 of the rules of this Court. At issue is an insurance company’s obligation to defend or provide coverage for parents who are being sued by their daughter.
Judge Russell Smith has certified the following two issues:
1. “Is the ‘household exclusion’ in a policy [of auto insurance], not certified under the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibility Act, valid?”
2. “Is a parent immune from action in tort brought against him by his children under the age of emancipation?”
On November 14, 1980, Mary Kay Haines was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
- Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Sorensen v. SorensenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Nocktonick Ex Rel. Matson v. NocktonickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wilkie v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.