Legal Opinion

Essex Chiropractic Office v. Amica Mutual Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 23, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierce, J. Plaintiff Essex Chiropractic Office (“Essex”) contends on this appeal

that the trial court erroneously awarded summary judgment to the defendant, Arnica Mutual Insurance Company (“Arnica”), based on a payment made by Arnica to Essex pursuant to Fascione v. CNA Ins. Cos., 435 Mass. 88 (2001). As to both the G.L.c. 90, §34M and the G.L.c. 93A claims, we affirm.

On June 4, 2009, Essex’s patient, Yorvi Matute (“Matute”), was involved in an automobile accident while covered by a standard Massachusetts automobile policy issued by Amica. Matute submitted two applications for personal injury…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Hershenow v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Fascione v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Lord v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Metro West Medical Associates, Inc. v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Norfolk & Dedham GroupMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
  2. Hartunian v. Pilgrim InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API